Is it possible to write a googolplex




















The search website Google did get their name from this very large number. A googol, officially known as ten-duotrigintillion or ten thousand sexdecillion, is a 1 with one hundred zeros after it. Written out, a googol looks like this: 10,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, The scientific notation for a googol is 1 x 10 Therefore, the only times a googol is a somewhat accurate estimate of anything is for hypotheticals.

After each chess player makes their first move, there are potential board setups. After each player has made two moves, there are , setups, after three moves there are over million, and the number continues to increase exponentially from there. One of them is a googolplex, which is a 1 followed by a googol of zeros. Counting to a googolplex would be even more impossible.

As a comparison, counting to a trillion would take roughly 31, years, and a trillion is only a 1 followed by twelve zeros! Kasner discussed googol and googolplex to show the difference between incredibly large numbers and infinity. Guess what? There are even larger numbers than a googolplex, although not many. If you want to learn about all the large numbers and see a chart that makes it easy to compare them to each other, check out our guide to large numbers.

This area of maths is often explained with the example of a party. Suppose you're having a party and you want to make sure you invite a good mix of people and decide to keep track of who knows who. Suppose you draw a map of the relationships of all your friends, linking two people with a blue edge if they are friends and with a red edge if they are strangers. Then you might end up with something like this:. Now this looks pretty complicated and it would take quite a lot of information to describe who is connected by red edges and who is connected by blue edges.

But if you zoom in on just Ann, Bryan and David, they are all joined by red edges. This red triangle is an example of order hiding in the messy overall network. The more ordered a system is, the simpler its description. The most ordered friendship network is one that has all the edges the same colour: that is, everyone is friends or everyone is strangers.

Ramsey discovered that no matter how much order you were looking for — whether it was three people who were all friends and strangers or twenty people who were all friends and strangers — you were guaranteed to find it as long as the system you were looking in was large enough. To guarantee yourself a group of three people who are all friends or all strangers you need a friendship network of six people: five people isn't enough as this counterexample shows.

The number of people you need to guarantee that you'll find three friends or three strangers is called the Ramsey number R 3,3. But we hit a wall very quickly. For example we don't know what R 5,5 is. We know it's somewhere between 43 and 49 but that's as close as we can get for now. Part of the problem is that numbers in Ramsey theory grow incredibly large very quickly. If we are looking at the relationships between three people, our network has just three edges and there are a reasonable 2 3 possible ways of colouring the network.

Mathematicians are fairly certain that R 5,5 is equal to 43 but haven't found a way to prove it. One option would be to check all the possible colourings for a network of 43 people.

But each of these has edges, so you'd have to check through all of the 2 possible colourings — more colourings than there are atoms in the observable Universe! Big numbers have always been a part of Ramsey theory but in mathematician Ronald Graham came up with a number that dwarfed all before it.

He established an upper bound for a problem in the area that was, at the time, the biggest explicitly defined number ever published.

Rather than drawing networks of the relationships between people on a flat piece of paper as we have done so far, Graham was interested in networks in which the people were sitting on the corners of a cube. In this picture we can see that for a particular flat diagonal slice through the cube, one that contains four of the corners, all of the edges are red.

But not all colourings of a three-dimensional cubes have such a single-coloured slice. Luckily, though, mathematicians also have a way of thinking of higher dimensional cubes. The higher the dimension, the more corners there are: a three-dimensional cube has 8 corners, a four-dimensional cube has 16 corners, a five-dimensional cube has 32 corners and so on. Graham wanted to know how big the dimension of the cube had to be to guarantee that a single-coloured slice exists.

Graham managed to find a number that guaranteed such a slice existed for a cube of that dimension. But this number, as we mentioned earlier, was absolutely massive, so big it is too big to write within the observable Universe. Graham was, however, able to explicitly define this number using an ingenious notation called up-arrow notation that extends our common arithmetic operations of addition, multiplication and exponentiation.

We can carry on building new operations by repeating previous ones. The next would be the triple-arrow. See here to read about the up-arrow notation in more detail. The number that has come to be known as Graham's number not the exact number that appeared in his initial paper, it is a slightly larger and slightly easier to define number that he explained to Martin Gardner shortly afterwards is defined by using this up-arrow notation, in a cumulative process that creates power towers of threes that quickly spiral beyond any magnitudes we can imagine.

But the thing that we love about Graham's number is that this unimaginably large quantity isn't some theoretical concept: it's an exact number. We know it's a whole number, in fact it's easy to see this number is a multiple of three because of the way it is defined as a tower of powers of three. And mathematicians have learnt a lot about the processes used to define Graham's number, including the fact that once a power tower is tall enough the right-most decimal digits will eventually remain the same, no matter how matter how many more levels you add to your tower of powers.

Graham's number may be too big to write, but we know it ends in seven. Mathematics has the power not only to define the unimaginable but to investigate it too. Rachel Thomas and Marianne Freiberger are the editors of Plus.

This article is an edited extract from their new book Numericon: A journey through the hidden lives of numbers. OK now the question is how does the expansion for different numbers work. Googolplexitoll, Googolplexigong is larger than googolplex. Omega is even larger than infinity! They all follow the same pattern. For up arrows, you just have one less up arrow than in the original problem. Put that back in your other problem. Unimaginably big. And that's only with only 4 up arrows.

Thanks for posting the correct definition. Posted March 4, edited. Edited March 4, by Xittenn. Posted March 6, If you extend the definition of write beyond what I had, photons would work reasonably well, but you'd have to have a high enough frequency so they didn't overlap or be very very patient with your transmitter Xitten, again, it depends on what you mean by write. Then it's just a matter of bandwidth, and how patient you are.

Posted March 6, edited. Xittenn Posted March 7, Posted March 7, If all attempts are being made to optimize would binary coded decimal truly be appropriate? Posted March 7, edited. John Cuthber Posted March 7, A googolplex is represented by 10 if you use the googolplex as the number base. RVJ Posted May 26, Posted May 26, Bringing life to an old topic: There is a website that allows you to fully visualize what it is you're asking. Delta Posted May 27, Posted May 27, EdEarl Posted May 27, Ron Bert Posted May 27, Posted May 27, edited.

Edited May 27, by Ron Bert. Create an account or sign in to comment You need to be a member in order to leave a comment Create an account Sign up for a new account in our community. We will not breach how to write a googolplex university or college academic integrity policies.

In write a googolplex , Larry Page and Sergey Brin were searching for names for …. We don't provide any. Then the number of zeroes that we could write is …. Disclaimer: nascent-minds is dedicated to providing how to write a googolplex an how to write a googolplex ethical tutoring write a googolplex service. A googolplex is the number 10 googol, or equivalently, 10 10 So if it takes.

As he unraveled a long roll of register tape with '0's written on it, Carl Sagan explained that in order to write down the long form of a googolplex, you would need more paper than you could possibly stuff into the entire known universe!!!

You will get some idea of the size of this very large but finite number from the fact that there would not be enough room to write it, if you went to the. It is so big that that if you were to write the whole thing out in books, they would weigh more than our entire planet — far more in fact A numerical expression is a mathematical sentence involving only numbers and one or more operation symbols.

Talk:Googolplex - Wikipedia. Einstein, simply because he had more. Year 4 maths — Exploring the properties of 2D and 3D shapes. See also write a googolplex googolplexian. A googolplex is much bigger than a googol, much bigger even than a googol times a googol. They can also be the radical symbol the square root symbol or the absolute value symbol Very likely, a googolplex won't be Goldbached into 2 provably prime numbers in my lifetime.

Your reader will see all details through the prism of your ideology. In this text, we have provided some writing tips for resumes and also the source of quality assistance The time it would take to write such a number also renders the task implausible: if a person can write two digits per second, it would take around 1.

It was suggested that a googolplex should …. It was first suggested that a googolplex should be 1, followed by writing zeros until you got tired. Edward Kasner, unsatisfied by this vague definition, redefined it to its current value For many people, Googolplex is the largest number with a name.

A googolplex, on the other hand, is a 1 followed by a googol of zeros, and that is a truly large number. A googol is a number with zeroes behind.

However in this "Googolplex Written Out" multivolume set of books, I am doing just that The number 10 to the power of a 'Googol' is called a 'Googolplex'. Because of this simplicity, even I fell for some ideas at first. This is a description of what would happen if one actually tried to write a googolplex , but different people get tired at different times and it would never do to have [Primo] Carnera a better mathematician than Dr.

A googolplex is the number 10 googol, which can also be written as the number 1 followed by a googol of zeros i. As described under the googol entry, credit for the invention of the -plex suffix is indeterminate. It can't be written out fully in any conceivable amount of time which is why we use write a googolplex exponents.

One of them is a googolplex, which is a 1 followed by a googol of zeros. Googolplex is a number, and you can do all the mathematical operations with it.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000