The goal of this conversation was to pose the question of whether peace is possible, and if so how it can be achieved. The consensus of this discussion was a firm conviction that contrary to the view of history that says that war is inevitable and constant, war is clearly affected by social institutions and structures and the world has been trending slowly and steadily in the direction of peace.
If these trends are supported and extended, peace is possible. This is ultimately not a moral claim, but an empirical one: battle deaths and major wars have declined throughout history and throughout the 20 th century, and so achieving peace is a question of reinforcing the drivers of this decline.
Our report, The Century of Peace? The existing pressures leading to peace are clear: economic development, human development, and global peacekeeping systems have all manifestly contributed to peace. Finally, participants raised the issue of norms and beliefs: the activist argument that violence is a choice has some merit, and the decision to use military force requires that people see such force as a legitimate tool.
As the world continues to trend towards peace, more direct engagement with the norms and beliefs that legitimize violence will be an important contributor to peace.
The record is not promising. None of the armed conflicts of the s ended with a stable settlement. The survival of cold war institutions, assumptions and rhetoric has kept old suspicions alive, exacerbating the post-communist disintegration of south-east Europe and making the settlement of the region once known as Yugoslavia more difficult. These cold war assumptions, both ideological and power-political, will have to be dispensed with if we are to develop some means of controlling armed conflict.
It is also evident that the US has failed, and will inevitably fail, to impose a new world order of any kind by unilateral force, however much power relations are skewed in its favour at present, and even if it is backed by an inevitably shortlived alliance.
The international system will remain multilateral and its regulation will depend on the ability of several major units to agree with one another, even though one of these states enjoys military predominance. How far international military action taken by the US is dependent on the negotiated agreement of other states is already clear.
It is also clear that the political settlement of wars, even those in which the US is involved, will be by negotiation and not by unilateral imposition. The era of wars ending in unconditional surrender will not return in the foreseeable future.
The role of existing international bodies, notably the UN, must also be rethought. Always present, and usually called upon, it has no defined role in the settlement of disputes.
Its strategy and operation are always at the mercy of shifting power politics. The absence of an international intermediary genuinely considered neutral, and capable of taking action without prior authorisation by the Security Council, has been the most obvious gap in the system of dispute management. Since the end of the cold war the management of peace and war has been improvised.
At best, as in the Balkans, armed conflicts have been stopped by outside armed intervention, and the status quo at the end of hostilities maintained by the armies of third parties. Whether a general model for the future control of armed conflict can emerge from such interventions remains unclear. The balance of war and peace in the 21st century will depend not on devising more effective mechanisms for negotiation and settlement but on internal stability and the avoidance of military conflict.
With a few exceptions, the rivalries and frictions between existing states that led to armed conflict in the past are less likely to do so today. There are, for instance, comparatively few burning disputes between governments about international borders. On the other hand, internal conflicts can easily become violent: the main danger of war lies in the involvement of outside states or military actors in these conflicts.
States with thriving, stable economies and a relatively equitable distribution of goods among their inhabitants are likely to be less shaky - socially and politically - than poor, highly inegalitarian and economically unstable ones. The avoidance or control of internal armed violence depends even more immediately, however, on the powers and effective performance of national governments and their legitimacy in the eyes of the majority of their inhabitants.
No government today can take for granted the existence of an unarmed civilian population or the degree of public order long familiar in large parts of Europe. No government today is in a position to overlook or eliminate internal armed minorities.
Yet the world is increasingly divided into states capable of administering their territories and citizens effectively and into a growing number of territories bounded by officially recognised international frontiers, with national governments ranging from the weak and corrupt to the non-existent.
These zones produce bloody internal struggles and international conflicts, such as those we have seen in central Africa. There is, however, no immediate prospect for lasting improvement in such regions, and a further weakening of central government in unstable countries, or a further Balkanisation of the world map, would undoubtedly increase the dangers of armed conflict.
A tentative forecast: war in the 21st century is not likely to be as murderous as it was in the 20th. But armed violence, creating disproportionate suffering and loss, will remain omnipresent and endemic - occasionally epidemic - in a large part of the world. The prospect of a century of peace is remote. Tel: War and peace. The past years changed the nature of war. We are currently working on a dataset of war and large-scale violent events over the long run.
If you want to contribute to this research please get in touch. This entry presents an empirical perspective on the history of war and peace. We also published a data visualization history of human violence here on OurWorldInData. It would be wrong to believe that the past was peaceful. One reason why some people might have this impression is that many of the past conflicts feature less prominently in our memories; they are simply forgotten.
The absolute number of war deaths has been declining since In some years in the early post-war era, around half a million people died through direct violence in wars; in contrast, in the number of all battle-related deaths in conflicts involving at least one state was 87, The decline of the absolute number of battle deaths can be seen in the visualization here that shows global battle deaths per year by world region. There are three marked peaks in war deaths since then: the Korean War early s , the Vietnam War around , and the Iran-Iraq and Afghanistan wars s.
There has been a recent increase in battle deaths driven by conflict in the Middle East, particularly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. The chart above refers only to battle deaths occurring in conflicts that involved at least one state on one of the opposing sides. We see that, in recent years, state-based conflicts form the majority of such deaths, though the genocide in Rwanda in stands out for its very high death-toll.
The previous two graphs showed absolute numbers, but as the world has seen rapid population growth see our entry on global population growth , it is more appropriate to look at relative numbers.
Here we show the battle death in state-based conflicts per , people per year. The figures are shown by type of conflict. The stacked area chart here shows the number of ongoing conflicts each year has risen.
This increase however only relates to civil conflicts within states. Conflicts related to the expansion or defence of colonial empires ended with decolonisation. Conflicts between states have almost ceased to exist. Read the article, " War may be closer than we think ," in Pacific Standard February 23, Search Enter the terms you wish to search for. Nothing unusual about 'the long peace' since WWII. Published: Feb. Categories: News.
0コメント